[vvrm]

Useful idea, but needs a lot more work IMO e.g.

- Looks like there's just 7 abstracts right now.

- Most of the abstracts are written by the author of the paper, so might not be as unbiased as an actual "community-written" abstract.

- There's no stated guidelines for the "community-written" abstract e.g. should it be less biased than the original abstract, should be shorter than the original, should it be more accessible to a less AI crowd or all of the above.

- There's no way to upvote/downvote some abstracts e.g. the "attention is all you need" paper has two abstracts and one of them is clearly worse than the other.

[yu3zhou4]

Hello! You are on point, building community to write the abstracts, while also setting up relevant guidelines are my main focus for now.

I will think of how to communicate guidelines and expectations to the content in a clear way. Thank you!

Upvote/downvote is available for logged users. As you pointed out, it's not visible when you're not logged in yet, so it would make sense to show score and buttons to anonymous users as well