(no title)
tb1989 | 1 year ago
As for OP1, packaging a tape effect when it can't produce good sound quality is a fraud. Sampling from FM? Check Klaus Schulze.. Music startups can certainly innovate, such as Roli (Seaboard and Rise), moog. make noise. Open source monome. and, to my sorrow, Émilie Gillet (Mutable Instruments). TE's innovation in music itself is far inferior to them. If you praise te, I think it is unfair to other people who are obsessed with technological innovation.
I have always felt that TE is a electronics company with no innovation in hardcore technology. The appearance and packaging are different from previous ones, but there is not enough practical integration. Of course, this is just my personal opinion. If you disagree, you can write down your opinion. Thank you.
Bjartr|1 year ago
* Battery powered * Easily backpack portable
* Standalone DAW
* Piano layout
* Physical knobs and keys
* Sequencer
* Screen (and accompanying UI) large enough to not feel incredibly cramped
That's plenty of stuff that beats the OP-1 on plenty of these, but there just isn't much out there that hits all of them at once.
dTal|1 year ago
smitty1110|1 year ago
1: https://www.expressivee.com/2-osmose
tb1989|1 year ago
datpiff|1 year ago
Lol this is music hardware. It's value is the joy people get from using it. The OP-1 has a huge fanbase that praise the workflow and the interface specifically. If "hardcore technology" is important to you then fine but I don't think that applies to most people buying synthesizers - right before the OP-1 the entire industry was deep in a trend of analog reissues.
FWIW I don't think an OP-1 is worth the asking price but after a short time with one it's clear where the money went.
swozey|1 year ago
I've been tempted to get that cheaper Pocket Operator to see if I'm missing out on something but have abstained so far.
But damn the stuff looks cool.
ado__dev|1 year ago