The project is licensed under a Business Source License [1] which wouldn't be widely considered open source due to the limitations it's placing on use, so advertising this as open source may be misleading to many. Source available is a more common term for these kinds of license.
If you're interested in why I think this distinction matters, I've written some thoughts about that on my blog [2].
Hi, I'm wells, the creator of NPi. NPi aiming to introducing a 'middle-layer' between LLMs and Agents, serves as a gateway for AI Agents action in virtual world!
NPi is currently under active development, we are eager to involve more AI Agent developers for building NPi together.
Hello! This sounds interesting, but I wasn't immediately understanding it. Does your project enable models like Llama, which don't have native tool use, to have tool use? If so, that would be super useful!
ssddanbrown|1 year ago
If you're interested in why I think this distinction matters, I've written some thoughts about that on my blog [2].
[1] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/ 991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0ebabca9b506677a/LICENSE
[2] https://danb.me/blog/open-source-available-distinction/
wenfengwang|1 year ago
Other parties under the Apache 2.0 License. you could check them out, SDK[2], Protocol[3]:
[1] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0...
[2] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/991bdc7e0c9830c89a81b07b0...
[3] https://github.com/npi-ai/npi/blob/main/proto/LICENSE
wenfengwang|1 year ago
NPi is currently under active development, we are eager to involve more AI Agent developers for building NPi together.
You could find our roadmap on https://www.npi.ai/docs/roadmap, or join Discord channel https://discord.gg/MQTuXtbj play together~
atlex2|1 year ago
cionut|1 year ago
onuratakan|1 year ago
mlamina|1 year ago
wenfengwang|1 year ago