If not, how do we mitigate those increases without CDR?
Maybe we don't, and the magical CDR unicorn isn't going to come and save us. I don't mean to speak for parent, but CDR is the "least effective way", yet many are speaking as if it's the most viable solution. And maybe it is, because $DEITY forbid that a dollar of CO2-producing profit be left on the table, but if that's the case then we are most certainly doomed.
mikestew|1 year ago
Maybe we don't, and the magical CDR unicorn isn't going to come and save us. I don't mean to speak for parent, but CDR is the "least effective way", yet many are speaking as if it's the most viable solution. And maybe it is, because $DEITY forbid that a dollar of CO2-producing profit be left on the table, but if that's the case then we are most certainly doomed.
silverquiet|1 year ago
If we ceased all economic activity today, then probably, but I assume you'd have to nuke most of the population or something equally catastrophic.
> If not, how do we mitigate those increases without CDR?
The half-assed approach (which I assume we'll take), is solar radiation management.