top | item 40260464

(no title)

tnmom | 1 year ago

Much of that money goes to permitting, admin, and insurance. What you’re seeing is probably the $10-20 million that wasn’t successfully siphoned off by bureaucrats.

discuss

order

duxup|1 year ago

> Much of that money goes to permitting,

How much?

SECProto|1 year ago

Their comment suggests 50 to 75%, which is hilariously high.

moneywoes|1 year ago

is this flow of dollars tracked anywhere

bmiller2|1 year ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted. There is a reason why development volume across states is asymmetric.

tnmom|1 year ago

Who knows - it’s just fake internet points. Hard to get worked up about.

BryantD|1 year ago

Because “successfully siphoned off by bureaucrats” has an implicit value judgement in it. If someone a) thinks the cost of regulation provides value and b) believes that downvoting is a reasonable response to opinions they disagree with, they’re likely to downvote in this case.

Personally I only believe one of those things. I also believe the point about additional cost of development could have been made without the value judgement.

stevofolife|1 year ago

Downvotes help people skip the noise and focus on the signal. Ain’t nothing wrong with that.