[degurechaff]

I think not using common license like GPL, BSD or MIT make people think twice before even trying the framework.

[rglover]

The license is pretty straightforward and fills in the gaps where the others fail to protect OSS creators (leading to headaches like w/ Redis). Perhaps it's too idealistic to think people will just read it and see if it matches their needs?

[kragen]

no, i've already spent the necessary hours of debating to what extent the agpl3 is compatible with cc-by-sa 4, i don't want to invest those hours again in a license that's used by only one project and, if history is any guide, probably contains important mistakes in how it's written and will need to be redrafted after those mistakes are noticed. i don't have a legal department

[golergka]

I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not risking my company's legal liability with my ability to comprehend a legal document.