top | item 40285396

(no title)

JulianChastain | 1 year ago

Some of the motivation for this comes from how often devs want to contribute to open source but are intimidated by how difficult the barrier of entry is, particularly for large projects. It's surprisingly hard to find a good list of projects that a beginner or even intermediate programmer can substantially contribute to. The ones that do exist tend to have the low hanging fruit plucked pretty quickly.

discuss

order

frognumber|1 year ago

A few points:

- Most of my career was made by being the author of one popular open source platform which happened to do well.

- I've recruited people based on open-source contributions. If I want an expert in [X], finding someone who contributed to [X] is a good bet.

- The flip side is I've made (minor, helpful) contributions to many projects in part for exposure. My name is in the commit list of many systems in domains where I have wanted to work.

- Many mid-sized contributions look good on a resume, especially for a junior developer. Indeed, I've made one case to promote someone based, in part, on contributing to a library we were using (even if only tangentially).

If you want a job in e.g. network security, find something in a firewall, anonymzing proxy, packet sniffer, or whatnot, and make a PR. It's often quick, easy, and helpful. A corollary is you do actually learn a lot about a system by contributing.

I have no axe to grind here, but I think the cynicism is unwarranted.

sevagh|1 year ago

I love open source. My cynicism isn't about open-source, but about the OP's first post being "these docs suck, snaps fingers maybe one of you non-devs can work on it."