(no title)
aethertron | 1 year ago
It would be sad if those bury the web and bury our rich, free open platform paradigm.
If a good decentralised open thing replaced it instead, cool.
aethertron | 1 year ago
It would be sad if those bury the web and bury our rich, free open platform paradigm.
If a good decentralised open thing replaced it instead, cool.
vincnetas|1 year ago
aethertron|1 year ago
One challenge for web-enjoyers is it's not obvious in a consensus-making way where 'weak points' that need help are, and what's an acceptable loss (say: video on the web. We can post raw video on a webhost. It's expensive, so no one does. And most video content is crap, so who cares - let the platforms have that?)
indigochill|1 year ago
Sure, there's a lot of DRM crap on the WWW now, but there's also still plenty of plaintext. The mainstream going with the EEE crowd is a given (being money people, they have the motive, means, and opportunity to streamline onboarding in a way the openness true believers don't), but the WWW platform remains fundamentally open despite everything thanks to the openness of the protocols it's built on.
A classic example of EEE closer to a protocol takeover is how Google handled XMPP. Yet people still use XMPP. It's just not huge. But open != huge or mainstream. Usually quite the opposite (see above about money people herding the mainstream to their platforms).
A rather more blatant takeover is the more recent hostile takeover of Freenode IRC. In that case the community revolted against the takeover and relocated (some to another IRC server and IIRC some to Matrix)
karol|1 year ago