That is the solution to moral dilemmas? Require the (small) victim to provide sufficient evidence to beat the (big power) abuser.
I mean, the idealistic founding fathers might have thought this is how the world will work, but look at reality: Where do you see little guys actually suing the big guys? The damage needs to be so tremendous that you can afford a lawyer to spend years on it.
So anything less than 10 million dollars goes to the big power. The law says "No damages were done". Morally, damages were done to the masses and this billionaire got richer.
Its an organization issue. The damages were done and EVERYONE knows.
resource_waste|1 year ago
I mean, the idealistic founding fathers might have thought this is how the world will work, but look at reality: Where do you see little guys actually suing the big guys? The damage needs to be so tremendous that you can afford a lawyer to spend years on it.
So anything less than 10 million dollars goes to the big power. The law says "No damages were done". Morally, damages were done to the masses and this billionaire got richer.
Its an organization issue. The damages were done and EVERYONE knows.