like someone mentioned in a separate comment, you are conflating disease with disability here. when people become too old to walk without assistance, you wouldn't say that they have a walking disease.
> when people become too old to walk without assistance, you wouldn't say that they have a walking disease.
Why not? We have some peculiar cultural memes related to accepting the inevitable end of life, which we perhaps should revisit. I see no reason to not consider aging itself as a slow-burn disease, one we'll hopefully cure at some point too.
> like someone mentioned in a separate comment, you are conflating disease with disability here. when people become too old to walk without assistance, you wouldn't say that they have a walking disease.
This girl's disease was a genetic auditory neuropathy.
They cured her genetic auditory neuropathy.
Pedantic arguments about what it's called are missing the point. The person had a specific disease. It was cured.
to you, this is a pedantic argument. but to millions of Deaf people in the US alone, this is a very important political point. for example, lots of Deaf people who prefer to live without cochlear implants face lots of pressure from people who consider deafness to be a "disease" to be "cured", when in fact, they feel their most authentic way of living to be something different. in this way, language is significant
TeMPOraL|1 year ago
Why not? We have some peculiar cultural memes related to accepting the inevitable end of life, which we perhaps should revisit. I see no reason to not consider aging itself as a slow-burn disease, one we'll hopefully cure at some point too.
xhevahir|1 year ago
Aurornis|1 year ago
This girl's disease was a genetic auditory neuropathy.
They cured her genetic auditory neuropathy.
Pedantic arguments about what it's called are missing the point. The person had a specific disease. It was cured.
anthony__j|1 year ago
s_dev|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]