[itsacomment]

> I don't understand why they would want to remove their code instead of wanting it to live on and further help more people through AI.

They do explain that in the post: because of the missing reciprocity. They didn't do it so OpenAI could profit off other's work, but to build a community with others. It's a pretty common motivator for humans.

[labrador]

How does removing their code help anyone? It barely makes the tineist bit of difference to Open AI, if any that's detectable. They aren't the only one's helping with that kind of code. "But it's the principle of the thing." Ok, well if it makes you feel good but that kind of self-centeredness belies your stated desire to help people.

edit: I think what bothers me is it seems like a Luddite reaction of someone who resents progress they don't approve of and want no part of it

[jnsie]

> How does removing their code help anyone?

The same way protesting anything helps anyone. It draws attention to a problem and, if the protest is visible enough, leads to positive change.

[sazz]

If it's a public good, then it's a public good. So whoever wants to use it according to the license it's fine.

If something is produced where the author is upset afterwards when this good is not used in the way he/she intended to, than it's the problem of the author in the first place to have choosen the wrong license.

[verdverm]

OpenAI is not the only one producing models from SO data. There are open models doing so as well