top | item 40340449 (no title) r-spaghetti | 1 year ago It even depends on is-odd (375K weekly downloads). The script kiddies have taken over. discuss order hn newest jjcm|1 year ago Which in itself depends on is-number (66M weekly downloads).The beautiful journey seems to end there.https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number Someone|1 year ago Combining that with https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-string, you can have a JavaScript valid x for which isNumber(x) && isString(x) ⇒ isNumber is better named “can-be-used-as-a-number”.Also, I don’t know JavaScript well enough, but https://www.npmjs.com/package/isnumber is different code from https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number, but does it have different semantics?(https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.isnumber is different, I think. It (rightfully, IMHO) thinks ∞ and NaN are numbers) jspash|1 year ago Which used to depend on the legendary `is-is` package. Apparently the maintainer is a certain B. Clinton. dagw|1 year ago Wow! there are almost 2500 packages on npm that depends on is-number. That's insane. warpech|1 year ago Hopefully is-odd does not depend on is-even joegibbs|1 year ago It actually depends on "is-number", which is a very useful package containing num => typeof num === "number" No joke. load replies (1)
jjcm|1 year ago Which in itself depends on is-number (66M weekly downloads).The beautiful journey seems to end there.https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number Someone|1 year ago Combining that with https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-string, you can have a JavaScript valid x for which isNumber(x) && isString(x) ⇒ isNumber is better named “can-be-used-as-a-number”.Also, I don’t know JavaScript well enough, but https://www.npmjs.com/package/isnumber is different code from https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number, but does it have different semantics?(https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.isnumber is different, I think. It (rightfully, IMHO) thinks ∞ and NaN are numbers) jspash|1 year ago Which used to depend on the legendary `is-is` package. Apparently the maintainer is a certain B. Clinton. dagw|1 year ago Wow! there are almost 2500 packages on npm that depends on is-number. That's insane.
Someone|1 year ago Combining that with https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-string, you can have a JavaScript valid x for which isNumber(x) && isString(x) ⇒ isNumber is better named “can-be-used-as-a-number”.Also, I don’t know JavaScript well enough, but https://www.npmjs.com/package/isnumber is different code from https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number, but does it have different semantics?(https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.isnumber is different, I think. It (rightfully, IMHO) thinks ∞ and NaN are numbers)
jspash|1 year ago Which used to depend on the legendary `is-is` package. Apparently the maintainer is a certain B. Clinton.
warpech|1 year ago Hopefully is-odd does not depend on is-even joegibbs|1 year ago It actually depends on "is-number", which is a very useful package containing num => typeof num === "number" No joke. load replies (1)
joegibbs|1 year ago It actually depends on "is-number", which is a very useful package containing num => typeof num === "number" No joke. load replies (1)
jjcm|1 year ago
The beautiful journey seems to end there.
https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number
Someone|1 year ago
Also, I don’t know JavaScript well enough, but https://www.npmjs.com/package/isnumber is different code from https://www.npmjs.com/package/is-number, but does it have different semantics?
(https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.isnumber is different, I think. It (rightfully, IMHO) thinks ∞ and NaN are numbers)
jspash|1 year ago
dagw|1 year ago
warpech|1 year ago
joegibbs|1 year ago