top | item 40353000

(no title)

sourdoughness | 1 year ago

This is the question I come back to: a crucial advantage of plastic is that nothing eats it. What’s the missing step that allows things to eat it, but only when we’re ready for them to?

discuss

order

contingencies|1 year ago

Perhaps long term exposure to the fungisphere? Perhaps the breakdown should be by fungal digestion to inert bio-molecules not physical abrasion to forever-threatening microplastics. But I'm neither a chemist nor a microbiologist, just an amateur dilettante retro-industrialist roboticist.

People say "hey it should degrade" but the problem is degrading generally means worse properties. If you think about the qualities of polymers in actual use... at least in the food chain ... a thin layer allows water tightness, resistance to high temperatures (>100°C), thin deposition so materially efficient. This is hard to match with a "discard in to nature without fear" material. The best match is actually .. palm leaves, which - surprise, surprise - are a recognised packaging and water-proofing material in a large number of premodern cultures. The fallback option in evidence with such cultures (still in India) is low-grade pottery, which result by physical abrasion in dirt.

Perhaps we should just train a plant to grow watertight, microwave safe noodle bowls and be done with it.