[desro]

if it's good and it works well, then the human using the LLM did a good job, and need not credit their LLM of choice as one would not credit their rubber duck.

[OuterVale]

This thought process begs the question, why not just review code and deny what's bad, rather than blanket ban any code with LLM involvement? That way you retain the productivity benefits of LLMs, and can still deny flawed code.

[edflsafoiewq]

Their issue is copyright, not code correctness/quality.

[famouswaffles]

You have a rubber duck that writes code?

[ssd532]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rubber_duck_debugging