I've never heard of a musical group or artist who can make a sustainable living on just a local scene (although maybe that's rather the point, since they stayed local to wherever they are). Even for huge artists, from what I've heard merch is where the money is, not ticket or record sales (or today, streaming, which is _ludicrously_ tilted against the artist actually making any money). Admittedly I last looked into this around twenty years ago and my sample is tilted more towards the folk singer-songwriter type rather than, say, DJs.That's not to diss local artists, though. Some are incredibly talented, and I loved the scene I was in it. Just, if we're talking about investing, making music looked like 9 times out of 10 a money sink you do for the love of it, not an investment opportunity.
StackRanker3000|1 year ago
That’s not quite true. It’s an extreme example, but Taylor Swift’s personal earnings from her current tour is expected to end up in the billions.
Back in the day, touring was something of a marketing tool to sell records, today the records are marketing for the tours (and they build hype, which yields sponsorships and so on). Merch is an important revenue stream, but a large chunk of that is sold on tour.
saberience|1 year ago
throw_nbvc1234|1 year ago
ipaddr|1 year ago
Many classic rock bands with members in their 40/50/60s perform live, have a local following and make good money without selling CDs.
Cover bands are often local and make good coin without album sales.
Then you have musicians performing children who get paid.
You are never going to be a pop star or a VC rocketship company but few are. But you can make a solid living just performing locally.