I love this. I read so much criticism here, but noise pollution is a main issue when it comes to railroads in residential zones.
Yes, punctuality is an issue with Deutsche Bahn. No, this doesn’t fix that instantly. But as an organisation you can work on two things at the same time.
This invention is spectacular. I wish more people would work on noise pollution. It makes a huge difference.
> I wish more people would work on noise pollution
Absolutely agree.
It's one of the most insidious kinds of pollution that has big effects
on mental and cardio-vascular health, and is accumulative.
Everything from aircraft, to emergency vehicle sirens, to construction
and poor housing, is slowly killing people.
In Europe we've actually made big leaps forward with regulation,
building standards for isolation, and abatement laws. But these often
go unenforced or even flippantly dismissed and mocked because people
don't recognise the harm pathways and effects.
Whenever this topic comes up I am reminded of this (very funny)
curmudgeon's screed "On Noise". Although Arthur Schopenhauer was
"serious" about this, his acerbic style only gets more funny with time
[0].
Noise reduction with trains is probably best done with improving the trains. I live next to a frequent trainline, so I can say:
There are modern long electric passenger trains, that barely make a noise at all. And then there are old freight trains, that can be heard from miles away. Since I doubt this noise barrier will be placed everywhere except at some very special key areas, I rather want the Bahn to focus on better trains in general.
Sad, but true. Some people even spray paint the windows of the actual passenger cars [1]. It's not rare and most sprayers do not have the skill of the person who painted this car. I don't get it.
Many things are covered in graffiti in Western Europe. It always baffles me that people are in such a defeated state of mind that graffiti is just simply accepted and seemingly nothing is done about it.
If you dive into the graffiti scene a bit you will start to appreciate all those graffitis. The story behind some of them is super interesting. There is a lot of "competition", "collaboration", and group dynamics involved. It is truly fascinating. I was living in Cologne (Ehrenfeld) for a while in a place with awesome graffiti and every weekend there were people taking pictures "collecting" and documenting the graffiti.
The article ends "the potential for faster planning approvals and reduced objection rates from communities, ultimately speeding up project completions." so their goal might be to build faster regardless how they'll look soon after.
With the goals stated in the article they only really need to stay transparent in concept renders of new projects. Once built they only need to fulfill the noise insulation targets and be less of an eyesore than their solid counterparts
It's interesting to read this conversation about graffiti happening on
a hacker forum, yet it seems stuck in a polarised stand-off around
aesthetics and ownership rights.
That's a shame, because the root issues are in information warfare,
the battle to control information spaces.
To the extent The Internet is still considered a "public space";
Is spamming and trolling not a form of digital graffiti?
Is the creation of products and apps that have a negative impact on
society not a "narcissistic imposition"?
Is the appropriation of the commons or other private property
to spread messages (advertising or graffiti) not the same
in the digital realm?
And those who "clean up" graffiti... do we not call then "censors" or
"like down/up-voting" when we wish to amplify or make other people's
communications in the world disappear because we disagree with them?
At the end of the day we are all still animals shouting to be heard
the loudest in our jungle. Online or offline we're party to the same
personality traits of quiet orderliness or disorganised
expression. What happens in cyberspace hardly seems different from
what happens IRL with spray-paint.
A semi-related surprising fact I only learned recently is that the ultra-long nose of Japanese bullet trains is not for aerodynamics, but to reduce noise. Specifically, "tunnel boom."
The quality of my life would be better improved through public transportation and these sound absorbers than almost any app I use. Hooray for basic infrastructure.
I would go further, and say that public transport improves quality of life far more than sound absorbers for public transport do. It's nice that these things exist, but we should be spending money on more public transport, not necessarily on making public transport more palatable to people. I realise that's an unfortunate necessity, but it's clear that people pushing back on public transport just haven't seen its benefits enough.
My hart jumped when I initially thought that they had implemented an idea that I had once.
Turns out MetaWindow is not an augmented reality display in the train's window, where one can read information on the scenery that one passes through while traveling. What is that city in the distance? When was that church built? How many cows are in that meadow? Stuff one has to know.
My guess is it's related to "metamaterials", which are materials engineered to have interesting properties by including structures smaller than the wavelength of whatever is going through them (sound, microwaves, even visible light if the structures are fine enough). There is quite a lot of research into sound-absorbing yet porous acoustic metamaterials.
Seems to be a before picture. There's an "after" picture further down the page. Meta technology maybe because it's not actual train related tech, but meta tech related to trains.
They specifically mention railway noise. I wonder whether there's something special about railways, or whether it would work for other noise as well? Especially roads with cars on them?
I think there are noises specific to railways. And from what I believe this "MetaWindow" targets relevant frequencies.
However, I am sure this also works for the frequencies generated by car traffic.
At least the linked youtube video in this comment [1] does not mention anything about frequencies.
Railways are unique because they go right through the densest part of towns and cities. For them to be most effective, they should be within biking or ideally even walking distance of a significant number of homes and offices. If you place a railway on the outskirts of a city, nobody is going to use it. This means you're going to have to use very significant noise reduction to keep the area livable.
Highways care a lot less about location. Place them a one-minute car ride outside the city, and its noise becomes basically irrelevant. The city grows and swallows the highway? Just place an industrial area or mall between the highway and any homes. When homes aren't an arms-length away you can get away with far more primitive noise reduction.
Lots of negative comments on this. I, for one, am glad to see work that supports better transport infrastructure while not being insanely ugly like a lot of transport infrastructure is (like the giant concrete birds nests of highways in US cities). I want to live in cities that are visually appealing.
I can't find it any more but I read a paper decades ago on the sound modulation effects of different plants, at scale and how designed planting around motorways can help reduce local resident impact.
This project was probably very cheap compared to the cost of fixing the Deutsche Bahn's horrendous problems with delays and cancelations.
The Deutsche Bahn has literally decades of maintenance to catch up on. Even if the Deutsche Bahn does everything right from now on, the next decade is going to be very painful for German train commuters.
[+] [-] earthnail|1 year ago|reply
Yes, punctuality is an issue with Deutsche Bahn. No, this doesn’t fix that instantly. But as an organisation you can work on two things at the same time.
This invention is spectacular. I wish more people would work on noise pollution. It makes a huge difference.
[+] [-] nonrandomstring|1 year ago|reply
Absolutely agree.
It's one of the most insidious kinds of pollution that has big effects on mental and cardio-vascular health, and is accumulative.
Everything from aircraft, to emergency vehicle sirens, to construction and poor housing, is slowly killing people.
In Europe we've actually made big leaps forward with regulation, building standards for isolation, and abatement laws. But these often go unenforced or even flippantly dismissed and mocked because people don't recognise the harm pathways and effects.
Whenever this topic comes up I am reminded of this (very funny) curmudgeon's screed "On Noise". Although Arthur Schopenhauer was "serious" about this, his acerbic style only gets more funny with time [0].
[0] https://www.gutenberg.org/files/10732/10732-h/10732-h.htm
[+] [-] lukan|1 year ago|reply
There are modern long electric passenger trains, that barely make a noise at all. And then there are old freight trains, that can be heard from miles away. Since I doubt this noise barrier will be placed everywhere except at some very special key areas, I rather want the Bahn to focus on better trains in general.
[+] [-] veunes|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] lqet|1 year ago|reply
Most rail noise barriers in Germany are completely covered in graffiti [0], so I wouldn't expect them to remain transparent for more than a few weeks.
[0] https://ga.de/imgs/93/8/5/9/3/0/9/1/9/tok_8596521c60eeaa53ee...
[+] [-] Propelloni|1 year ago|reply
[1] https://www.flickr.com/photos/kami68k/50329760658
[+] [-] highcountess|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] andersa|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] umpalumpaaa|1 year ago|reply
Edit: Not "all of those" but "many of those"
[+] [-] mtmail|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] tuukkah|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] wongarsu|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] nonrandomstring|1 year ago|reply
That's a shame, because the root issues are in information warfare, the battle to control information spaces.
To the extent The Internet is still considered a "public space";
Is spamming and trolling not a form of digital graffiti?
Is the creation of products and apps that have a negative impact on society not a "narcissistic imposition"?
Is the appropriation of the commons or other private property to spread messages (advertising or graffiti) not the same in the digital realm?
And those who "clean up" graffiti... do we not call then "censors" or "like down/up-voting" when we wish to amplify or make other people's communications in the world disappear because we disagree with them?
At the end of the day we are all still animals shouting to be heard the loudest in our jungle. Online or offline we're party to the same personality traits of quiet orderliness or disorganised expression. What happens in cyberspace hardly seems different from what happens IRL with spray-paint.
[+] [-] wiether|1 year ago|reply
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_art
[+] [-] DeathArrow|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ghostly_s|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mikeiz404|1 year ago|reply
And the PhotonicVibes site is here: https://phononic-vibes.com/metawindow-for-railway/
Here is a demo video for a meta material made by them: https://youtu.be/NElK8qKRrBU?si=CfBjUESlu_XUvnn_
[+] [-] riffraff|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] mbforbes|1 year ago|reply
Random source: https://www.jrpass.com/blog/why-shinkansen-bullet-trains-no-...
[+] [-] bobthepanda|1 year ago|reply
new train tunnels built in Europe are wider and flare out at the end so that there isn't a tunnel boom.
[+] [-] esafak|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] danpalmer|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] smokel|1 year ago|reply
Turns out MetaWindow is not an augmented reality display in the train's window, where one can read information on the scenery that one passes through while traveling. What is that city in the distance? When was that church built? How many cows are in that meadow? Stuff one has to know.
[+] [-] pjc50|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] dgellow|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] reportgunner|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] JR1427|1 year ago|reply
Unless you mean that there would still be a normal window, too?
[+] [-] tetris11|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] callalex|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] croemer|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] metters|1 year ago|reply
[1] https://www.deutschebahn.com/de/presse/pressestart_zentrales...
[+] [-] wiml|1 year ago|reply
(Related, but maybe not technically a metamaterial, previously on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38678415 )
[+] [-] addandsubtract|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] pimlottc|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] eru|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] metters|1 year ago|reply
At least the linked youtube video in this comment [1] does not mention anything about frequencies.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40384778
EDIT: I was wrong about the video. There is _no mention_ about frequencies.
[+] [-] crote|1 year ago|reply
Highways care a lot less about location. Place them a one-minute car ride outside the city, and its noise becomes basically irrelevant. The city grows and swallows the highway? Just place an industrial area or mall between the highway and any homes. When homes aren't an arms-length away you can get away with far more primitive noise reduction.
[+] [-] ghostly_s|1 year ago|reply
edit: I did find this cool demo of a similar product of theirs, but seems to be nothing more online about the noise barrier.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUee93HcPVQ
[+] [-] mindwok|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] ggm|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] vezuchyy|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] felsokning|1 year ago|reply
This reads like a "we did a cool thing" but without qualitatively demonstrating the merits for the need.
[+] [-] unknown|1 year ago|reply
[deleted]
[+] [-] surfingdino|1 year ago|reply
Analyst: "We could really use a bridge here..." Decision Maker: "I hear you, let's dig a tunnel!"
[+] [-] Bluestein|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] jasonvorhe|1 year ago|reply
[+] [-] DiogenesKynikos|1 year ago|reply
The Deutsche Bahn has literally decades of maintenance to catch up on. Even if the Deutsche Bahn does everything right from now on, the next decade is going to be very painful for German train commuters.
[+] [-] lionkor|1 year ago|reply