(no title)
throwaway11460 | 1 year ago
- he didn't make sure somebody helped the new team members build and run the project
- he didn't make sure somebody took the new guys through their first PR
- he bragged about the project being nonstandard and complicated and was delighted when the new guys couldn't just figure it out
- he decided his own opinions and goals are more important than his employers' but still took their money
- then he bragged about all of this on the internet as if he was some big hero that saved the job market
Wtf is this bullshit doing on HN front page? This is not the way to run software teams.
MrDresden|1 year ago
They mention that the offshore team got extensive hand holding with him, and that the project is very well documented. Still they were unable to get anything done even after a month.
And then two months in, they start lying to their own managers to hide their incompetence.
If a team that is selling their expertise as a product is unable to get anything done until on the three month mark, and the results are as pathetic as the author makes it out to have been then they get no sympathy from me.
throwaway11460|1 year ago
1 month is no time to expect great results even with onshore employees coming into your office, much less remote guys in a nonstandard difficult project. They probably meant they are finally beginning to understand it.
This is not "a team", it's a bunch of new developers in the authors' team and treating them in any other way is a serious leadership mistake. The author is wasting his employer's money.