I cannot agree more with the author’s point of view. As an illustration, many people want to use GPS for the safe positioning of trains in the European Train Control Systems. This makes the space sector happy because it justifies the expenditures incurred for putting things like Galileo in orbit. However, in a pre-war check exercise, one immediately come to the conclusion that all European trains would crawl to a stop in case the GPS is jammed or interfered with. We were not very listened to… until Ukraine.Critical infrastructures should not depend from things that are located in space or on the other side of the planet. These are one of those things were market logic should be anticipated with regulations (we can’t wait for the next Titanic). Another point touched by the article.
Animats|1 year ago
Railroads can now outsource train control. Wabtec's "Wabtec Cloud Positive Train Control Communication Solution" - "A complete turnkey hosted office solution for I-ETMS-based Positive Train Control (PTC) systems"[1] (Wabtec used to be Westinghouse Air Brake.)
Wabtec has had break-ins, but claims they only involved employee info, not control systems.[2]
[1] https://www.wabteccorp.com/digital-intelligence/signaling-an...
[2] https://industrialcyber.co/ransomware/wabtec-suffers-data-br...
tru3_power|1 year ago
616c|1 year ago
So, my hat off to you, Internet stranger.
killjoywashere|1 year ago
#1 > Or disable a hospital.
The entire Ascension Healthcare system of hospitals (142 hospitals, 2600 total facilities) in on divert since 8 May because they had to switch back to paper records. Change Healthcare has lost $872M since it was attacked in February.
Maybe it's more like the pandemic: seems like nothing, unless it affects you.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascension_(healthcare_system)
https://www.wired.com/story/change-healthcare-admits-it-paid...
#2 > Does your stuff need computers working 5,000 kilometers away? [implying that's bad]
What if you live on the Gulf Coast, exposed to hurricanes? You want compute resources warm and ready far away from that region. After Katrina, the Tulane medical school was able to re-form quickly because the noteservice was running a bulletin board forum on a VM in Romania. Everything else was underwater.
#3 > This is the sound-powered phone
Have you used a sound-powered phone? I managed damage control in a ship. Sound powered phones barely works. And the coordination system to actually fight that fire requires radios and making overhead announcements that definitely depend on electrical power.
#4 > They tried to sort of renew this emergency telephone network
When the entire San Diego region lost power during rush hour for 4 hours in 2011, the cell phone system still worked. I was able to email documents to Tokyo from a car despite no traffic lights.
#5 > Because if the cable to the US is down
Sure, but there are a lot of disasters where the cables are fine. Graceful degradation is all about having widely distributed options. Lots of people have What. Signal is even better for people with more serious responsibilities, IMHO. And, friends, if you think IP networks are vulnerable, get yourself a starlink terminal and a HAM radio license.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starshield
freehorse|1 year ago
We are talking about war-like situations, and where one state actor has incentive to cause maximum harm to another. Exposing your infrastructure like this is unlike damage that can come from natural disaster. For example, disrupting the communications exactly before the attack. Similar issues (though through lower tech hacking) happened in 7th of October during the Hamas attack in Israel, where the over-reliance on advanced, complicated technology became a liability.
The stuff you describe make sense in normal, peaceful situations, where the cost of securing certain infrastructure can be higher than the cost of a power cut once. That has nothing to do with what the article really says, which is basically that infrastructure is currently not as secure from a potential hostile state attack. Also, in that case, a hostile state actor can combine attacks that together cause more damage than the sum of the attacks independently.
hughesjj|1 year ago
The whole idea of the internet (and even some of our infra, like suburbs or highways/rail) is that there's no one single point of failure. Like designed-to-survive-nuclear-war redundant.
Definitely incorporate the most advanced tech you can for when things are going smoothly to get that efficency gain, but there's a reason all branches of the military (that I'm aware of) still train and test their aptitude using paper maps and trig instead of relying 100% on GPS and electronic devices.
toast0|1 year ago
Around me, cell towers have 3-5 hours of battery when utility power is out. If your outage had gone on much longer, you would likely have seen cell towers start dropping out.
Of course, my area also has some other nasty SPoFs. A couple years ago, a telco cable was severed and DSL for everyone was out and at least some of the cell towers were live, but no service. A few weeks ago, the cableco had its wires severed, and cable tv and internet was offline, and so were some cell towers. IIRC, for the telco one t-mobile worked and verizon didn't, and for the cableco t-mobile didn't work and verizon did. Not sure about at&t.
indymike|1 year ago
The question is, what is the cost to secure? I've been in so many meetings where the cost of security is 10-15x the cost of a breach. It's horrifying.
baxtr|1 year ago
alephnerd|1 year ago
That said, paper based redundancies do exist as a massive ransomware attack is similar in impact to a multiweek power outage.
pyrale|1 year ago
You have to understand that this article was written by an European technologist worrying about a war situation. Sure, you can make a counter-point, but your counter-example is very different in many aspects: nature of the threat, jurisdictions involved, orgs involved, etc.
dralley|1 year ago
GuB-42|1 year ago
[deleted]
adrianN|1 year ago
crocal|1 year ago
marcosdumay|1 year ago
They should have lots and lots of local transmitters.
numpad0|1 year ago
The absolute last resort for trains is semaphores and mutexes based on physical tokens. Those concepts came from there, and were still used sometimes to this day. Doesn't sound high tech, but it works.