> A failsafe on-board multi-sensors localisation unit consisting of a navigation core (IMU, tachometer, etc.) brought in reference using GNSS, track map and a minimal number of reference points
> to complement the existing European Train Control System (ETCS) odometry system by using GNSS to enable absolute safe train positioning whilst also transforming today’s train localisation by demonstrating a GNSS based multi-sensor fusion architecture.
Okay, so as I expected they want to add GNSS as an additional sensor input. That is useful because without it train odometry is purely relative and the train doesn't know where it is until is reads the first balise. The plan doesn't seem to be to remove all other sensors. Denial of GNSS would then mean that start-of-mission is about as tedious as it is today and odometry accuracy might be reduced. Depending on the number of balises on the track that lowers the capacity of the track a little but is far from catastrophic.
adrianN|1 year ago
> A failsafe on-board multi-sensors localisation unit consisting of a navigation core (IMU, tachometer, etc.) brought in reference using GNSS, track map and a minimal number of reference points
From https://www.clug2.eu/objectives/
> to complement the existing European Train Control System (ETCS) odometry system by using GNSS to enable absolute safe train positioning whilst also transforming today’s train localisation by demonstrating a GNSS based multi-sensor fusion architecture.
Okay, so as I expected they want to add GNSS as an additional sensor input. That is useful because without it train odometry is purely relative and the train doesn't know where it is until is reads the first balise. The plan doesn't seem to be to remove all other sensors. Denial of GNSS would then mean that start-of-mission is about as tedious as it is today and odometry accuracy might be reduced. Depending on the number of balises on the track that lowers the capacity of the track a little but is far from catastrophic.
crocal|1 year ago
Second, in a war-like scenario, do we really want to have our critical infrastructures unable to operate at full capacity?