(no title)
delish | 1 year ago
I haven't paid attention to these kinds of optional disclosures. Never thought about it but were I asked I would have said these are advertisements. I don't dislike sustainability, but I thought those function as advertisements because you can expect to get more sustainability "for free" over time, because of many things (Moore's Law, ephemeralization, societal investment). So of course savvy corporations publish sustainability reports that say, "We're doin' great : )."
Therefore I'd argue their commitment to sustainability is shown by their disclosure of the increase.
1vuio0pswjnm7|1 year ago
Alternatively, one could argue the increase shows their commitment to profit at the expense of the environment and the voluntary disclosure shows a commitment to greenwashing.
Nition|1 year ago
alpinisme|1 year ago
karma_pharmer|1 year ago
... noticed that it doesn't even define "indigenous"
gds44|1 year ago
darkerside|1 year ago
GeekyBear|1 year ago
Didn't they just learn a lesson about the additional bad press you can be subjected to if you try to hide the severity of your security issues instead of just owning up to what's happening?
kolinko|1 year ago
p3rls|1 year ago
asabjorn|1 year ago
[deleted]
faeriechangling|1 year ago