IDK why 81 year old Poli-sci major, attorney, and ultimate NASA executive decision maker Bill Nelson wasn't forced out of office after he incorrectly explained to Congress that the far side of the moon is always darkhttps://youtu.be/daZyPwCQak8?si=n9KXH-LJFBlpKXUp&t=153
bryananderson|1 year ago
divbzero|1 year ago
SJC_Hacker|1 year ago
What's more troubling is the next statement - "We don't know whats there". Well, we've done tons of imaging on that side, since the 1960s. So I think we know something about whats there. Its just that there doesn't appear to be that much interesting there, that merits a specific landing mission.
selimthegrim|1 year ago
LeifCarrotson|1 year ago
Politics and rules lawyering are what matter in that space.
Tao3300|1 year ago
Might be too much to hope for, but he could just mean it's always dark to us.
I'm getting of a kick out of this Trone calling it the "backside of a moon" and chewing on his glasses. Ain't no nerd. Tell me wut these Chinese is doing on the backside of the moon and leave the spacey mumbo jumbo out of it.
asmithmd1|1 year ago
I guess we have decided to elect political representatives are just egotistical camera whores, but why should the top decision maker at a technical agency be a complete idiot who is ignorant about many things the agency he runs has done? It would be like the head of the air force saying airplanes fly because of flubber
idlewords|1 year ago
jonathankoren|1 year ago
fallingknife|1 year ago
YZF|1 year ago
nine_k|1 year ago
During a solar eclipse, the far side is brightly lit, while the side turned towards us is dark.
Most of the time the dark side does not match the far or the near side, we see a part of both the dark and lit sides as a crescent.
I don't see how "the far side" and "the dark side" can be used interchangeably in any situation.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]