top | item 40420534 (no title) LightFog | 1 year ago You are trying to suggest that Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t have a detailed knowledge and control over core Meta features, nor knowledge of the societal damage they can do? discuss order hn newest danjl|1 year ago No, I am not. You are employing a logical fallacy known as "Denying the antecedent". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denying_the_antecedent zaphirplane|1 year ago My casual reading of the thread says you are falling for a variance of the fallacySomeone isn’t knowledgeable and responsible for every detail of every feature means they are responsible and knowledgeable for none load replies (1) LightFog|1 year ago Not intentionally if so - I must be missing something more subtle in your comment. load replies (1)
danjl|1 year ago No, I am not. You are employing a logical fallacy known as "Denying the antecedent". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denying_the_antecedent zaphirplane|1 year ago My casual reading of the thread says you are falling for a variance of the fallacySomeone isn’t knowledgeable and responsible for every detail of every feature means they are responsible and knowledgeable for none load replies (1) LightFog|1 year ago Not intentionally if so - I must be missing something more subtle in your comment. load replies (1)
zaphirplane|1 year ago My casual reading of the thread says you are falling for a variance of the fallacySomeone isn’t knowledgeable and responsible for every detail of every feature means they are responsible and knowledgeable for none load replies (1)
LightFog|1 year ago Not intentionally if so - I must be missing something more subtle in your comment. load replies (1)
danjl|1 year ago
zaphirplane|1 year ago
Someone isn’t knowledgeable and responsible for every detail of every feature means they are responsible and knowledgeable for none
LightFog|1 year ago