top | item 40427044 (no title) thyrox | 1 year ago Surprised the headline didn't mention it was a Boeing 777. Points to bbc for not going for the obvious clickbait. discuss order hn newest dewey|1 year ago Why would the 777 be clickbait? 737 maybe. ibejoeb|1 year ago The 787 has been in the news very recently for two possibly related incidences of sudden nose-down resulting in similar injuries. They aren't turbulence related, but writing "Boeing" and "injury" in the same headline is going to draw clicks. manarth|1 year ago "Boeing" would be the clickbait. load replies (1) phendrenad2|1 year ago The bar is truly low is we're congratulating the media that.
dewey|1 year ago Why would the 777 be clickbait? 737 maybe. ibejoeb|1 year ago The 787 has been in the news very recently for two possibly related incidences of sudden nose-down resulting in similar injuries. They aren't turbulence related, but writing "Boeing" and "injury" in the same headline is going to draw clicks. manarth|1 year ago "Boeing" would be the clickbait. load replies (1)
ibejoeb|1 year ago The 787 has been in the news very recently for two possibly related incidences of sudden nose-down resulting in similar injuries. They aren't turbulence related, but writing "Boeing" and "injury" in the same headline is going to draw clicks.
dewey|1 year ago
ibejoeb|1 year ago
manarth|1 year ago
phendrenad2|1 year ago