(no title)
carbonatom | 1 year ago
I don't have any fancy tools or frameworks to create extension-less URLs. I just dump my HTMLs into a folder. So can /now.html work for this?
Edit: Wow! Why downvote me for an honest question? What's so revolting about this question that you feel the need to downvote this?
denzil|1 year ago
carbonatom|1 year ago
But "/now.html" feels "cleaner" to me. I know others might disagree.
If this now thing could support just "/now.html" or even "/now" redirecting to "/now.html", that would be swell! Maybe they already do support it? Hoping to learn from the community if these alternative paths are supported.
anentropic|1 year ago
there's no reason your HTML files have to be named with .html at the end of the filename
carbonatom|1 year ago
How do you know that? Do you know how I use my computer? I need to browse the HTML files lying on my disk with my browser? My OS and browser does not open files that are not named .html on the disk as HTML pages on the browser. So I need them to be .html so that I can browse my pages on my laptop.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]