[dgoncharov]

> In the US, this is part of the EHR push, each EHR is supposed to accept any outside application

To be explicit for readers here, outside applications can connect to some EHR systems using SMART on FHIR, but not all (this is what Apple Health supports in their PHR) - and this is separate from HIEs. For reasons OP mentioned, this is impractical for treatment at scale, but is currently the best way to get your health records in your pocket, or to insurance companies, for example.

Fasten is a great OSS project that facilitates this flow for individuals, and I'd suggest you check them out: https://github.com/fastenhealth/fasten-onprem

> getting a hook into the vendor operated HIEs

This is a only part of the equation - for example, one of the biggest networks we connect with is Carequality, and this is more of a framework that's not operated by any vendors. Rather, vendors connect to a shared directory and speak the same language for medical data exchange.

> The evil part of the operation is that now Metriport has proxy access to the data and eventually will get hacked

This just speaks even more volumes to our open source approach - we're not hiding behind obscurity for security.

> and bought by private equity that will sell the data to TransEquirian Insurance Score agencies.

Only if someone wants spend a long time in prison! We can not legally do anything with the data we have proxy access to, except deliver it to the healthcare organizations we work with that are involved with treating the patient - nor would we want to. There are acquisition events with healthcare organizations all the time, and the HIPAA rules protecting the data do not change.

Hopefully you can agree that, especially with us being the only vendor in the space that's open source, there is no evil at play.

[adunsulag]

>To be explicit for readers here, outside applications can connect to some EHR systems using SMART on FHIR, but not all (this is what Apple Health supports in their PHR) - and this is separate from HIEs. For reasons OP mentioned, this is impractical for treatment at scale, but is currently the best way to get your health records in your pocket, or to insurance companies, for example.

Just a minor detail here. My understanding from my attendance at some of the ONC Information Blocking seminars is that if the EHR is ONC certified, they are required to provide access to a patient using any app of the patient's choice. The rules are very different if its a provider app or an app that can provide access to data for multiple patients. Unfortunately, not all EHRs are certified (looking at you mental/behavioral health sector, and cash-only EHRs).

We continue to struggle with this in our own EMR implementation as app providers constantly complain that provider/system level access to the data requires manual human intervention, which we aren't going to change anytime soon. Things like Unified Data Access Profiles (UDAP) Dynamic Client Registration are looking to mitigate some of these problems.

What I'm intrigued about with Metriport is that app providers could connect directly to them to get the patient data as long as our EMR feeds data into the HIEs they work with.