top | item 40508908

(no title)

exitheone | 1 year ago

"we" as in "a group of people not in a position to provide any evidence or investigate"?

Yes, absolutely, because all "we" would be adding to the conversation is speculation. No new information can be gained here.

discuss

order

pests|1 year ago

Who said "we" were going to investigate or speculate?

There is a difference between a witch hunt and making sure underheard voices get attention.

I was suggesting "we" make sure these claims are not being ignored because they are against a public figure. The fact they are a public figure and "might get blackmailed all the time" doesn't somehow relieve a person of criticism. That "we" ensure the proper authorities and groups prioritize finding new information or investigate these claims instead of being swept under a rug.