I found the images distracting, and in particular the tweet-sized chunks of text separated by picture or two made the text hard to follow.
So I think it's a legitimate criticism as this is a site for technical folks. Sure, not the topic of the post being commented on, but a good example to discuss.
Thanks for the reminder, but anyone visiting this site on a restricted data plan may be in for a surprise. Websites that download a quarter gigabyte of data without warning is more than an annoyance.
How do you suggest I warn others to avoid this site? I don't think it's suitable for HN in its current state.
Author here. That's definitely my bad and not an intended user experience. The text was initially meant as a transcript accompanying presentation slides. I've compressed the images so it should be at least slightly better now.
jazzyjackson|1 year ago
If so, then, maybe all those images aren’t adding a lot to your article. At the very least, leave Taft there! You just admitted it looks better."
https://idlewords.com/talks/website_obesity.htm
jasonjmcghee|1 year ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
gumby|1 year ago
So I think it's a legitimate criticism as this is a site for technical folks. Sure, not the topic of the post being commented on, but a good example to discuss.
padolsey|1 year ago
throwup238|1 year ago
ggorlen|1 year ago
How do you suggest I warn others to avoid this site? I don't think it's suitable for HN in its current state.
xigoi|1 year ago
alisonkisk|1 year ago
vkb|1 year ago
wkat4242|1 year ago
The article itself is a confusing jumble of fiction, religion and tech though. I don't grok it.