France did something like that last month. To support the "Centre national de la musique", a new 1.2% tax was added on digital music streaming services. But rather than absorbing the cost, Spotify just raised its subscription cost.
In the end, the government just taxes its citizens more instead of getting a bigger share of revenue from these companies.https://newsroom.spotify.com/2024-03-07/spotify-to-adjust-it...
gbanfalvi|1 year ago
Companies are constantly adjusting subscriber count vs revenue per subscriber and will charge the absolute maximum they can get away with. Doesn’t make sense not to as a profit-driven company.
bravetraveler|1 year ago
It overwhelmingly goes in one direction. A new sucker is born every day
The network effect of this is "the money machine must grow/demands more". They don't have to do this - everyone knows how well-paid their people are. It's a system of systems.
There's an academic understanding and then the practical one. Everyone stands to benefit from a Boogeyman
kbelder|1 year ago
fmobus|1 year ago
It's a positive outcome of economic science that procuders can't fully pass taxes to consumers. There's always some sort of division of the overall dead weight loss, and it's always proportional to that market's conditions (competition, market share, elasticity, etc). If a producer decides to try to fully pass the price, it's because they believe their costumers are inelastic or that competition will not be able to undercut them.
To put it another way: if companies were fully passing tax hikes onto the customer... then companies wouldn't be complaining about taxes!
chrisandchris|1 year ago
I mean, Microsoft raised their prices last year substantually. And they had a "record year 2023".
pleb_nz|1 year ago