I'm not sure what world you live in, but Nvidia sells their cards at 1.5 - 2 times the price than AMD's on average and AMD has had strong Linux support for years.
When AMD can run 95% of games as good as any NVIDIA card and you factor in that most games have virtually no ray tracing support or any other fancy feature that NVIDIA offers, coupled with the known low performance/cost gains in their own graphics family, and their lack of ability to support demand despite being a trillion dollar company, I'd say that there isn't much of a leg to stand on.
Nvidia and AMD (previously ATI) have had a similar relationship for a long time, before ML was a use case. Nvidia has always been the more expensive option afaik. Kinda like Intel vs AMD.
MR4D|1 year ago
Another narrative is that AMD undercuts Nvidia prices because their product isn’t as good.
Worse, Intel then undercuts AMD pricing for video cards because theirs aren’t even as good as AMD’s.
When you get to antitrust, things like this are important. I may agree with you, but an Nvidia lawyer will take this tact and run with it.
_nist|1 year ago
hot_gril|1 year ago