I suspect it'll actually work much longer and just become more obnoxious to enable in a year. A complicated workaround that placates power users so they stay on Chrome but that most users won't bother with is perfect.
If Google leaves a boolean switch in Chromium to keep V2 enabled then I assume most if not all of the third party Chromium-derived browsers will just flip it to true by default. That's easy for them to do, the hard part is if Google strips out V2 altogether and leaves the downstream browsers to patch it back in.
I consider my non-technical friends/family technically dead. They're lost souls you can't help, like Elizabeth Swan looking down at her father's ghost on the boat. We can't help.
Freedom and privacy are luxuries only available to those nerdy enough to use Linux. The rest are prey/prisoners/peasants to the technofeudal overlords.
After the XUL removal debacle a number of years ago, I can't trust Firefox to offer a suitably flexible and capable extension system over the long run.
While some people will claim that those changes were necessary, the impact was still very negative for the extension developers and users who were affected at the time.
The numerous other user-hostile decisions made by Firefox's developers certainly don't help repair the trust that was lost then.
First recommendation would be a pihole running anywhere you can run it, but if you don't want to or can't do that, you can use Steven Black's ad list to create a hosts file to DNS sink ad/bad networks locally:
Isn't DNS-level blocking strictly less capable than even the nerfed Manifest V3 filtering API? V3 can still block at a more granular level than nuking entire hostnames AFAIK, even if it's not as granular as V2.
Nope, it will be removed after 1 year. There is a chance they delay it depending on how much the enterprises complain, but so long as all their big clients are migrated I doubt they care about the long-tail.
There's a good chance that whoever is driving this change within Google gets promoted/retires in less than a year, and then it gets left in limbo forever like so many other TODO():'s in the code...
Question: Is it possible to run ad blocking at the OS level rather than in the browser? Requests to ad servers just never leave your PC? traffic from ad servers just never arrives at the browser?
A common approach is to mess around with name resolution. Many operating systems have a hosts file that can be modified. You can do DNS on your own computer. Piholes are a variation on this where people usually use a separate machine to handle DNS requests for their entire network. If you cannot change the DNS for your computer/device, some people use a VPN. I believe this is how things are currently handled on Android.
This approach is less flexible than the filtering you can get from a web browser. On the other hand, it can be used to filter DNS requests from all software. With something like a Pihole, you can configure the Pihole and (maybe) your router, and it will work for all devices on your network.
On Android there is AdGuard which runs a VPN locally to block ads. It can also parse SSL traffic if one installs an SSL certificate but I don't like the idea very much. In the end I just use it as a light adblock for unencrypted traffic when I don't use Firefox.
Serious question, why is anyone still using Chrome? It's so user-hostile and basically spyware at this point, it boggles my mind that anyone would intentionally install spyware on their computer.
2) Report those sites to https://webcompat.com/, and/or to Mozilla (who have an evangelism team to reach out to those sites and get them to stop doing that).
I just keep a Chrome install around and when a website seems like it's misbehaving I just fire it up in Chrome.
It's a bunch of baggage to have around, but it's useful for other stuff. Like when you hit your monthly limit of free articles you can just fire it up in Chrome and now you've doubled your monthly free limit!
How many people are gonna do all this to get an adblocker working? How long is this workaround gonna be allowed by google?
What excuses remain for sustaining the chromium monopoly that allows this shitshow, and for using chrome and chromium derived browsers instead of firefox?
martin293|1 year ago
Source: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate...
plorkyeran|1 year ago
justahuman74|1 year ago
Is the go-to now just 'install firefox'?
coolelectronics|1 year ago
jsheard|1 year ago
shrimp_emoji|1 year ago
Freedom and privacy are luxuries only available to those nerdy enough to use Linux. The rest are prey/prisoners/peasants to the technofeudal overlords.
VancouverMan|1 year ago
While some people will claim that those changes were necessary, the impact was still very negative for the extension developers and users who were affected at the time.
The numerous other user-hostile decisions made by Firefox's developers certainly don't help repair the trust that was lost then.
hgs3|1 year ago
It's an opportunity for someone to write an "adblock fixer" app for the non-technical market.
causality0|1 year ago
zxxh|1 year ago
[deleted]
fifteen1506|1 year ago
gravescale|1 year ago
quickthrowman|1 year ago
chx|1 year ago
So people will just take the sudden deluge of ads in stride and move on. Chances of this moving people to Firefox is slim.
nazgulsenpai|1 year ago
https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts
jsheard|1 year ago
stavros|1 year ago
krackers|1 year ago
Nope, it will be removed after 1 year. There is a chance they delay it depending on how much the enterprises complain, but so long as all their big clients are migrated I doubt they care about the long-tail.
londons_explore|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
sigma5|1 year ago
jay_kyburz|1 year ago
II2II|1 year ago
This approach is less flexible than the filtering you can get from a web browser. On the other hand, it can be used to filter DNS requests from all software. With something like a Pihole, you can configure the Pihole and (maybe) your router, and it will work for all devices on your network.
Krssst|1 year ago
stvltvs|1 year ago
https://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm
efilife|1 year ago
ipsum2|1 year ago
drcongo|1 year ago
unpopularopp|1 year ago
For some handful of sites I have to keep a Chrome install around
JoshTriplett|1 year ago
2) Report those sites to https://webcompat.com/, and/or to Mozilla (who have an evangelism team to reach out to those sites and get them to stop doing that).
actinium226|1 year ago
It's a bunch of baggage to have around, but it's useful for other stuff. Like when you hit your monthly limit of free articles you can just fire it up in Chrome and now you've doubled your monthly free limit!
page_fault|1 year ago
freehorse|1 year ago
What excuses remain for sustaining the chromium monopoly that allows this shitshow, and for using chrome and chromium derived browsers instead of firefox?
cranberryturkey|1 year ago
coolelectronics|1 year ago
jiggawatts|1 year ago
“No, I don’t want to jump out. Stop telling me that!”
actinium226|1 year ago
efangs|1 year ago
skrause|1 year ago
baxuz|1 year ago
Teknomancer|1 year ago
tumsfestival|1 year ago
hehdhdjehehegwv|1 year ago
gddgb|1 year ago
[deleted]
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
noman-land|1 year ago
[deleted]
TheGlav|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
scotthn|1 year ago
[deleted]
actinium226|1 year ago
nunez|1 year ago