top | item 40602886

PSA: How to keep using adblockers on Chrome and Chromium

133 points| coolelectronics | 1 year ago |gist.github.com

92 comments

order

martin293|1 year ago

This solution will work for exactly a year. That's how long google gives enterprises to migrate to manifest v3.

Source: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate...

plorkyeran|1 year ago

I suspect it'll actually work much longer and just become more obnoxious to enable in a year. A complicated workaround that placates power users so they stay on Chrome but that most users won't bother with is perfect.

justahuman74|1 year ago

This seems like it's too hard to tell friends/family.

Is the go-to now just 'install firefox'?

coolelectronics|1 year ago

i would always tell them to install firefox. this is mostly for developers and tech oriented people who need to keep chrome around

jsheard|1 year ago

If Google leaves a boolean switch in Chromium to keep V2 enabled then I assume most if not all of the third party Chromium-derived browsers will just flip it to true by default. That's easy for them to do, the hard part is if Google strips out V2 altogether and leaves the downstream browsers to patch it back in.

shrimp_emoji|1 year ago

I consider my non-technical friends/family technically dead. They're lost souls you can't help, like Elizabeth Swan looking down at her father's ghost on the boat. We can't help.

Freedom and privacy are luxuries only available to those nerdy enough to use Linux. The rest are prey/prisoners/peasants to the technofeudal overlords.

VancouverMan|1 year ago

After the XUL removal debacle a number of years ago, I can't trust Firefox to offer a suitably flexible and capable extension system over the long run.

While some people will claim that those changes were necessary, the impact was still very negative for the extension developers and users who were affected at the time.

The numerous other user-hostile decisions made by Firefox's developers certainly don't help repair the trust that was lost then.

hgs3|1 year ago

> This seems like it's too hard to tell friends/family.

It's an opportunity for someone to write an "adblock fixer" app for the non-technical market.

causality0|1 year ago

You can't just send them a .reg file and tell them to double click on it and hit ok?

zxxh|1 year ago

[deleted]

fifteen1506|1 year ago

Just tell them to use Edge. It's the worse you can do to Google.

gravescale|1 year ago

Finally some news that makes me think the Firefox has a glimmer of hope left.

quickthrowman|1 year ago

Same here, I’ll be switching to Firefox today after hearing this news.

chx|1 year ago

Every app there are gets worse and worse -- aka Doctorow's enshittification

So people will just take the sudden deluge of ads in stride and move on. Chances of this moving people to Firefox is slim.

nazgulsenpai|1 year ago

First recommendation would be a pihole running anywhere you can run it, but if you don't want to or can't do that, you can use Steven Black's ad list to create a hosts file to DNS sink ad/bad networks locally:

https://github.com/StevenBlack/hosts

jsheard|1 year ago

Isn't DNS-level blocking strictly less capable than even the nerfed Manifest V3 filtering API? V3 can still block at a more granular level than nuking entire hostnames AFAIK, even if it's not as granular as V2.

stavros|1 year ago

First recommendation would be Firefox.

krackers|1 year ago

>key was added and will presumably stay forever

Nope, it will be removed after 1 year. There is a chance they delay it depending on how much the enterprises complain, but so long as all their big clients are migrated I doubt they care about the long-tail.

londons_explore|1 year ago

There's a good chance that whoever is driving this change within Google gets promoted/retires in less than a year, and then it gets left in limbo forever like so many other TODO():'s in the code...

sigma5|1 year ago

I switched to firefox one year ago. Works fine!

jay_kyburz|1 year ago

Question: Is it possible to run ad blocking at the OS level rather than in the browser? Requests to ad servers just never leave your PC? traffic from ad servers just never arrives at the browser?

II2II|1 year ago

A common approach is to mess around with name resolution. Many operating systems have a hosts file that can be modified. You can do DNS on your own computer. Piholes are a variation on this where people usually use a separate machine to handle DNS requests for their entire network. If you cannot change the DNS for your computer/device, some people use a VPN. I believe this is how things are currently handled on Android.

This approach is less flexible than the filtering you can get from a web browser. On the other hand, it can be used to filter DNS requests from all software. With something like a Pihole, you can configure the Pihole and (maybe) your router, and it will work for all devices on your network.

Krssst|1 year ago

On Android there is AdGuard which runs a VPN locally to block ads. It can also parse SSL traffic if one installs an SSL certificate but I don't like the idea very much. In the end I just use it as a light adblock for unencrypted traffic when I don't use Firefox.

efilife|1 year ago

Look up technitium dns

ipsum2|1 year ago

Too bad the HN Flamewar detector removed this post from the homepage. The content is interesting, the comments are pointless bickering over browsers

drcongo|1 year ago

Serious question, why is anyone still using Chrome? It's so user-hostile and basically spyware at this point, it boggles my mind that anyone would intentionally install spyware on their computer.

unpopularopp|1 year ago

How do you make sites that are only whitelist certain browsers to work under Firefox? Is there an app, extensions etc anything?

For some handful of sites I have to keep a Chrome install around

JoshTriplett|1 year ago

1) User agent switcher.

2) Report those sites to https://webcompat.com/, and/or to Mozilla (who have an evangelism team to reach out to those sites and get them to stop doing that).

actinium226|1 year ago

I just keep a Chrome install around and when a website seems like it's misbehaving I just fire it up in Chrome.

It's a bunch of baggage to have around, but it's useful for other stuff. Like when you hit your monthly limit of free articles you can just fire it up in Chrome and now you've doubled your monthly free limit!

freehorse|1 year ago

How many people are gonna do all this to get an adblocker working? How long is this workaround gonna be allowed by google?

What excuses remain for sustaining the chromium monopoly that allows this shitshow, and for using chrome and chromium derived browsers instead of firefox?

cranberryturkey|1 year ago

firefox is still the best browser.

coolelectronics|1 year ago

i do wish! firefox has web features missing that i need on a daily basis, and their developer team seems wholly uninterested on working on them at all

jiggawatts|1 year ago

“I like this pot, but it just keeps getting warmer and warmer. Does anyone know where I can get some ice packs or something?”

“No, I don’t want to jump out. Stop telling me that!”

efangs|1 year ago

everyone should just have a pihole

skrause|1 year ago

Pi-hole and other DNS-based ad blockers are a lot worse than even Manifest v3 ad blockers, so they aren't any alternative.

baxuz|1 year ago

Use Adguard

gddgb|1 year ago

[deleted]

noman-land|1 year ago

[deleted]

TheGlav|1 year ago

It's IE all over again. Sometimes you can't.

scotthn|1 year ago

[deleted]

actinium226|1 year ago

But Brave is based on Chrome, so won't it be affected the same way? And same for Arc?

nunez|1 year ago

Or maybe stop supporting Google's quest to monopolize the web and use (and test against!) LITERALLY ANY OTHER BROWSER