While I agree with the notion of the article, please stop calling gifted, driven, and non-conforming people "weird nerds."
Both terms have negative connotations.
The intent is to de-stigmatize the labels. I consider myself a "weird nerd". I find the use of the label affirming. Perhaps ASD or other symptom descriptive way to describing things would be more "correct". However "weird nerd" is what the other parts of society use to describe these terms. Using the term to describe the positive aspects of these symptoms helps to take the sting out.
If we're gonna find a better way to work together we need something neutral so that there's no reason to miscategorize yourself. I definitely prefer "weird nerd," to anything that feels like a diagnosis or like praise.
I think "genius" fits the author's meaning and connotation much better than "weird nerd". If the author wants to fight for genius rights, why start from a position of weakness?
doug_durham|1 year ago
__MatrixMan__|1 year ago
In education they call this "twice exceptional".
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
programjames|1 year ago
croes|1 year ago