top | item 40630888 (no title) quern | 1 year ago I agree he's correct about the physics but I disagree with his father's economics -- my thinking on economics is more in line with David's. discuss order hn newest dools|1 year ago Yes I retract my "wrong about physics" assertion, I have had it explained to me and I get it:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40631089Although I still think Chicago school/libertarian economics is "confidently wrong". quern|1 year ago Evidently, but presenting that assertion without backing it up with any kind of argument isn't very constructive.Of course I don't expect anyone to refute an entire school of thought in an HN post.
dools|1 year ago Yes I retract my "wrong about physics" assertion, I have had it explained to me and I get it:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40631089Although I still think Chicago school/libertarian economics is "confidently wrong". quern|1 year ago Evidently, but presenting that assertion without backing it up with any kind of argument isn't very constructive.Of course I don't expect anyone to refute an entire school of thought in an HN post.
quern|1 year ago Evidently, but presenting that assertion without backing it up with any kind of argument isn't very constructive.Of course I don't expect anyone to refute an entire school of thought in an HN post.
dools|1 year ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40631089
Although I still think Chicago school/libertarian economics is "confidently wrong".
quern|1 year ago
Of course I don't expect anyone to refute an entire school of thought in an HN post.