(no title)
iEchoic | 1 year ago
Author's suggestion that they could have taken a "similar level of risk" as an early employee by taking secondaries as a founder is way off, IME.
iEchoic | 1 year ago
Author's suggestion that they could have taken a "similar level of risk" as an early employee by taking secondaries as a founder is way off, IME.
jmward01|1 year ago
toomuchtodo|1 year ago
If you want to get wealthy, there are more efficient, less effort ways. If you want to suffer with low chances of success based on all available data, well, help yourself to the firehose of startup jobs.
beambot|1 year ago
> I have been an early or first engineer at five different companies and have had three liquidity events in a 9-year career.
A "big" success is a 10+ year journey. For an early employee, it is perfectly acceptable to give a few weeks' notice and move on to the next lotto ticket. This doesn't work for a key founder-exec -- they're likely going to commit to a decade working on one big problem, and investors want to incentivize them to shoot for the moon & stick with it for the long haul.
It's definitively not the same for an early employee.
AnarchismIsCool|1 year ago
The employees bear the burden too, if they're working their asses off at an early stage startup they believe in the cause just as much. Viewing founders as somehow magically special is a symptom of the broader misguided hero worship the US has right now.
bps4484|1 year ago
I've been a founder, and I've been a key early employee. It is very different.
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]