[bungeonsBaggins]

> You seem legitimately offended that this guy has preferences and opinions

No, I am not offended that anyone has preferences or opinions. What I am responding to is this language:

> Neither a Vision Pro owner nor much of a hog cranker

> native applications designed to aid manipulating oneself

> dead-eyed men and women rutting on camera

...which is intended to indicate disdain towards people who produce or consume pornographic material. I think that this person is going out of their way to be an unkind contrarian regarding porn, and in my opinion that deserves a little light ridicule!

[georgespencer]

> ...which is intended to indicate disdain towards people who produce or consume pornographic material.

The only intention was to rejoin OP's "hog cranking" euphemism with some fun ones from the English lexicon. (That it appears to have caused you to make a spectacle of yourself for no reason whatsoever is a bit of a bonus, though.)

[rKarpinski]

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html