top | item 40731971 (no title) trentnelson | 1 year ago I should probably do an updated talk/article/deck on io_uring.I really do like NT internals though. discuss order hn newest nullindividual|1 year ago I would love it if you did! You're actually one of the few sources that shines a bright spot on what the NT kernel is good at, outside of the ex-Sysinternals folks. xoranth|1 year ago Is there any good article on NT internals (that isn't Russinovich' book), that highlight where/how it is better than Linux and other *BSDs?When asked people point to IOCP vs epoll, but I'm not sure how relevant it is now that Linux has io_uring.(They also point to stable ABIs for drivers, but I am more interested in internals)
nullindividual|1 year ago I would love it if you did! You're actually one of the few sources that shines a bright spot on what the NT kernel is good at, outside of the ex-Sysinternals folks.
xoranth|1 year ago Is there any good article on NT internals (that isn't Russinovich' book), that highlight where/how it is better than Linux and other *BSDs?When asked people point to IOCP vs epoll, but I'm not sure how relevant it is now that Linux has io_uring.(They also point to stable ABIs for drivers, but I am more interested in internals)
nullindividual|1 year ago
xoranth|1 year ago
When asked people point to IOCP vs epoll, but I'm not sure how relevant it is now that Linux has io_uring.
(They also point to stable ABIs for drivers, but I am more interested in internals)