top | item 40763928

(no title)

injb | 1 year ago

To ensure the natural advantage that strong people have over weak people, of course. Nature has ordained that the strong should subjugate the weak, and the equalizing force of firearms is thus an afront to nature, and is not to be tolerated!

discuss

order

squigz|1 year ago

Describing widespread firearms as socially "equalizing" is a new one to me, so thanks for that.

Turing_Machine|1 year ago

Firearms grant their owners the right to say "No".

Tyrants hate that.

Before firearms the world was mostly ruled by "nobles" (i.e., those who had extorted enough from the peasants to afford weapons and armor, and had the free time for the required years of training).

Now, it isn't. That didn't happen because the "nobles" suddenly decided to turn into nice guys.

StefanBatory|1 year ago

"God made some men tall and some men short. Sam Colt made all men equal."

rcxdude|1 year ago

physical strength, dexterity, skill, and combat training still make a hell of a difference in a gunfight. A gun only makes a physically weak person strong against someone without a gun.