[SassyBird]

> 100% branch coverage means that you've fundamentally covered all potential states your software can enter.

No, it doesn’t.

  bool is_even(int n) {
      return true;
  }

  bool test_is_even() {
      return is_even(2);
  }

100% test coverage. And yet.

[ffsm8]

Are you seriously that big brain that you think that's smart?

Your example software makes the claim that integers that the given runtime/interpreter/VM can handle will be assured as true. This was tested.

Nobody said that any description of the software is always correct, just because a test was added that tests random stuff

Also note that that's not 100% coverage. It merely covers your code, which builds upon other code.

Feel free to actually read the given link. Your horizon might be expanded. Or don't, and keep your dunning kruger worldview

[discreteevent]

Those who dunning kruger should be careful lest they be dunning krugered themselves!