top | item 40798931

(no title)

atlasy1 | 1 year ago

Why would producers go beyond the FDA legal requirement? Would they not be brought to bankruptcy by the free market for doing such things?

I believe you don’t think through anything you say if you can say something as foolish as that.

Companies already do not go beyond the standard required by the FDA when they were use sugar derived from wheat in their products.

This “sugar” makes people who are very sensitive to gluten very ill and uncertain as to what foods are genuinely safe.

The FDA do not require companies to put labels on the food stating it’s derived from wheat. They don’t have to label the food as containing wheat or gluten.

Yet the food for example sweets where 80% of its composition may come directly from sugar “derived from” (and so is) wheat basically and contaminated are just labelled as containing sugar.

I don’t think any gluten intolerant person wants to be chewing on mouthfuls of partial wheat or have all of their foods wrapped in similar materials

The FDA will gaslight them and hand wave it a away saying that they can’t reliably test levels below a certain threshold and they’re being selfish as micro plastics are harming the 99.9% (which is bs)

discuss

order

No comments yet.