[gepardi]

Why is this author so mad?

[seanhunter]

Because if they posted any sort of reasonable article it wouldn't get traction (including being posted here).

[ThrowawayTestr]

People are inherently trusting LLMs without even remotely understanding them.

[sandwitches]

Because AI bullshit is ruining everything we've ever loved?

[rramadass]

Exactly! This is lunacy.

[Grimblewald]

Id argue ai accelerates bullshit slingers output disproportionately to genuine creators so theyre flooding the space - but people are the problem not ai (yet)

[paulddraper]

Wrong side of the bed for sure

[lurking_swe]

probably because they stumbled upon yet another “AI” blog post that is a complete waste of time.

I’d be annoyed too. At least this guys angry blog post is somewhat educational - reminding us of biases and how NOT to use LLM’s.

all this being said, time to go outside and touch some grass. Get off the computer for a bit.

[rsynnott]

I can't speak for them, obviously, but, argh, this AI bullshit is just getting so tedious. Like, the methodology described in the article is just _nonsense_.

> "On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question"

Like, people have known this doesn't work since literally the First Industrial Revolution. And yet still we try asking the magic oracle to unbias our data.