I really recommend reading any of David Foster Wallace's essays about tennis. The book "String Theory" collects all his writing on the subject. He was a lifelong fan of the sport, but also a nationally ranked junior player and he's able to provide exceptional insight in the insane dedication (as well as talent) needed to reach even the lowest rungs of the competitive tennis world, and what a grind the tour can be for lower ranked professionals.
chasebank|1 year ago
The dedication to become a top .0001% athlete is absolutely nuts and beyond that is uncomprehendable.
https://www.basketballnetwork.net/old-school/when-brian-scal...
Workaccount2|1 year ago
naveen99|1 year ago
0.0001% is one in a million. Or within top 7000 rank out of 7 billion humans globally. Or about 0.001% or one in a 100k out of the 700-1000 million in 20-30 age group.
There are about 70000 pro athletes in the world. So only 1 in a 10000 or 0.01% to be a pro athlete when you are in the age group.
Takes less than a year of recreational devotion for a smart healthy person to get into top 1% globally. getting into 0.01% is obviously more competitive and requires you to give up other things.
freddie_mercury|1 year ago
photon_lines|1 year ago
rapsey|1 year ago
papa-whisky|1 year ago
(As an aside, I'm surprised to see this in Esquire, do they still publish writing like this or was it a very different magazine "back in the day"?)
daseiner1|1 year ago
BaculumMeumEst|1 year ago