top | item 40831762

(no title)

MithrilTuxedo | 1 year ago

>We see this in a very specific case, which is in the onset of heart problems. So basically its a more nuanced finding. The finding is not quite as strong.

The one divorce I can think of in my extended family came from the onset of heart problems. Properly speaking, it was the abortion she had that caused the divorce, not the fact that she would have died otherwise.

discuss

order

karmajunkie|1 year ago

i think it was being married to an idiot that was the actual cause of the divorce.

toomuchtodo|1 year ago

~43% of first marriages fail, ~60% of second marriages, ~73% third marriages. Lots of people are emotionally unhealthy and barely equipped to adult, let alone have the grit, fortitude, and luck to make a partnership work for life. It is the hardest job you’ll ever have. The divorce rate is understandable considering the partnership expectations outcome mismatch in the aggregate.

https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/divorce/divorce-statist...

lupusreal|1 year ago

Suppose he really wanted kids and learned she couldn't have any. It wouldn't exactly be "until death do we part", but I think much of western society has already abandoned that standard anyway

dheera|1 year ago

Hm. Male with heart problems here. I am in a happy relationship now but dating has been hard in the past due to not being able do do certain things normally expected of men.

stavros|1 year ago

Like chop wood?

yieldcrv|1 year ago

if only there was an additional option for the fetus, is anyone working on that?

we could short circuit these association choices if the hosts could become unburdened while the fetus is able to live

bdcrazy|1 year ago

The main concern I see with "technologic" wombs is who is then responsible for the upbringing and care of the fetus until it because viable to live on its own? If someone gives up a fetus but is still force to be financially responsible for it, more harmful and destructive forms abortion will be, by necessity, be used.