(no title)
itsdavesanders | 1 year ago
And as a liberal I think “hell YES he should be prosecuted!” The government shouldn’t just go around killing citizens without due process. I don’t care what letter is by their name.
itsdavesanders | 1 year ago
And as a liberal I think “hell YES he should be prosecuted!” The government shouldn’t just go around killing citizens without due process. I don’t care what letter is by their name.
JamesBarney|1 year ago
Imagine the civil war if the union couldn't kill confederates.
SahAssar|1 year ago
A full scale civil war really is an extraordinary case and is a lot more akin to a regular war than what we are talking about here.
I'm more afraid of someone declaring war on an abstract concept (like the "war on terror") and then using broad powers meant to be used in normal wars between states that have declared combatants than I am of a civil war.
kelnos|1 year ago
But otherwise, the only remedy should be judicial process against these people: arrests, trial, etc. Otherwise we have a term for it: extrajudicial killing.
Of course, Congress has given the executive branch weird war powers over the past few decades, so legally I'm sure they're in the clear, unfortunately.
downWidOutaFite|1 year ago
vundercind|1 year ago
No, no: we do get that. We just think that’s a good thing. If you have the evidence (you don’t, or we’d have seen, like, any of it at all) then by all means, prosecute the absolute shit out of them!