The problem isn't them. We just not too long ago have a court case that questioned whether the President is considered an "officer of the United States." The unfortunate part of law is, half of law is arguing about what 'is' is.
So its not necessarily that words don't have meaning. Its more of, the words can change meaning.
A majority on the supreme court seem willing to bend reasonable definitions backward to get whatever they want. Second amendment 'right' to (non-militia) personal firearms for example.
treeFall|1 year ago
tcmart14|1 year ago
So its not necessarily that words don't have meaning. Its more of, the words can change meaning.
Red_Leaves_Flyy|1 year ago
paulryanrogers|1 year ago