top | item 40861770 (no title) someplaceguy | 1 year ago I'm sorry, I don't get it. What are you suggesting to be the motivation to remain anonymous in this case? discuss order hn newest jebarker|1 year ago I didn't mean to suggest anything. I was just interested in whether they thought that remaining anonymous was in keeping with their ex-colleagues character. Written communication is hard! unknown|1 year ago [deleted] DaiPlusPlus|1 year ago Prevents embarrassment if it turns out one’s idea is wrong, I suppose. someplaceguy|1 year ago The person in question formalized the entire proof in Coq, which certifies its correctness.To me, that makes your conjecture very unlikely to be true...
jebarker|1 year ago I didn't mean to suggest anything. I was just interested in whether they thought that remaining anonymous was in keeping with their ex-colleagues character. Written communication is hard! unknown|1 year ago [deleted]
DaiPlusPlus|1 year ago Prevents embarrassment if it turns out one’s idea is wrong, I suppose. someplaceguy|1 year ago The person in question formalized the entire proof in Coq, which certifies its correctness.To me, that makes your conjecture very unlikely to be true...
someplaceguy|1 year ago The person in question formalized the entire proof in Coq, which certifies its correctness.To me, that makes your conjecture very unlikely to be true...
jebarker|1 year ago
unknown|1 year ago
[deleted]
DaiPlusPlus|1 year ago
someplaceguy|1 year ago
To me, that makes your conjecture very unlikely to be true...