(no title)
ogarten | 1 year ago
Medical data for AI training is almost always sources in some more or less shady country because they lack any privacy regulations. It's then annotated by a hoard of cheap workers who may or may not have advanced medical training.
Even "normal medicine" is extremely biased towards male people fitting inside the norm which is why a lot of things are not detected early enough in women or in people who do not match that norm.
Next thing: Doctors often think that their annotations are the absolute gold standard but they don't necessarily know everything that is in an X-Ray or an MRI.
A few years ago we tried to build synthetic data for this exact purpose by simulating medical images for 3D body models with different diseases and nobody we talked to cared about it, because "we have good data".
aprilthird2021|1 year ago
DrScientist|1 year ago
Sadly I'd say that people are no different.
> it's trained on horrible cesspools of ....
So it's really not the future of AI we should be worrying about...
resource_waste|1 year ago
My conspiracy: With massive medical data, ML/AI would have been 'discovered'/built sooner. Limiting the data makes it so only a few people can be specialists under the supervision of medical cartels.
nradov|1 year ago
https://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/pr_08.asp
https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.ht...
KingOfCoders|1 year ago
davedx|1 year ago