top | item 40864676

(no title)

teh_infallible | 1 year ago

Rewatching this film, it really seemed fake to me. I love it, but I think it’s a mockumentary

discuss

order

nervousvarun|1 year ago

What a strange comment. Rewatching means you've seen it at least twice but you think it's a mockumentary?

Please help me with this logic because there's absolutely nothing funny about this film which is arguably one of the most disturbing ever made.

solumunus|1 year ago

I guess you must be unaware that the guy in the film was eventually mauled to death by bears?

EdwardDiego|1 year ago

You going to elaborate on that?

nkurz|1 year ago

Not the OP, but I have some of the same concern. No, it's not a "mockumentary"; yes, it's based on true events; but based on some of Herzog's other films and public statements, there are good reasons to doubt that it's a straight factual account of what happened. Herzog has frequently stated that he's not trying to relate straight facts, but is going for a deeper truth.

In pursuit of this, he's frequently bent the facts in his other "documentaries" to achieve the narrative that he's aiming for. I vouched for the parent comment because I think it's a view that should be discussed rather than suppressed. I like his art, but equating a Herzog documentary with factual truth is likely to end badly.

I've only skimmed it (and I don't have time to read it closer today) but this looks to be a decent academic paper that explores some of the problems with Grizzly Man:

Conceiving Grizzly Man through the "Powers of the False"

...

But is Grizzly Man a documentary at all? Is it a "true" or appropriate representation of reality? Grizzly Man engages in "creative falsification" -- a cinematic concept theorized by Gilles Deleuze in which the filmmaker generates optical images which bond to virtual images (or images that evoke a people's general past, fantasies, and dreams) to reveal some representation of "truth"

https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/scope/documents/2008/june-2008/...