I think what people are missing here is that his mathematics is describing a dynamic in observed interactions between magnetism and electricity that have something to do with vortex and toroidial fields. To understand the context one would have to study the life of Walter Russel first and understand how he was able to predict the existence of then-unknown elements. Also check out videos on "vortex mathematics" on YouTube. I'll admit here that this kind of delineation is vague by Terrence and could be better stated. I doubt his mathematics is supposed to generally replace "accounting" math.
No comments yet.