(no title)
thoronton | 1 year ago
It is not completely different. The CEOs should be liable for not properly overseeing their company and for not preventing the illegal actions of the company they're in charge of.
thoronton | 1 year ago
It is not completely different. The CEOs should be liable for not properly overseeing their company and for not preventing the illegal actions of the company they're in charge of.
robertlagrant|1 year ago
For example: if someone breaks into a bank, do you always fire the CEO?
Then: if an employee of the bank breaks into a bank, now do you always fire the CEO?