top | item 40915124

(no title)

h335ian | 1 year ago

This was originally planned in conjunction with the San Onofre nuclear power plant, which gave all of SoCal amazing power and offered the infrastructure for performing desalination in conjunction with ocean water used for cooling parts of the reactor. Sadly, some hippie in Sacramento decided to kill our power plant so now energy prices have soared and we’ve lost the potential for desalinated water in San Diego, Orange and LA counties. My buddy has been working the decommission for a decade now. Given a few beers, the rants are quite illuminating and disappointing

discuss

order

mdorazio|1 year ago

FYI, San Diego has a desalination plant that cost about a billion dollars to build and provides water equivalent to that used by 400,000 homes [1]. The lack of the San Onofre plant doesn't seem to be a limiting factor.

[1] https://www.sdcwa.org/your-water/local-water-supplies/seawat...

h335ian|1 year ago

Yup! If memory serves, some of the design was borrowed from the San Onofre plans. Certainly only limiting in terms of volume of desalinated water for Orange County. I believe that was the original intent as San Onofre is nicely situated to serve both counties

leereeves|1 year ago

Do these water restrictions apply to desalination? If not, perhaps they'll encourage more desalination.

chrisweekly|1 year ago

"some hippie in Sacramento"

surely it's more complicated than that?!

AnimalMuppet|1 year ago

I suspect the "hippie" was the governor (Sacramento is the state capital).

bilbo0s|1 year ago

Taking a decision to build a nuclear power plant on a fault line always is.

Better plan would probably be to build a nuclear plant in Arizona and export the power to California. Use some of it for desalination. Then export water to Arizona.

But nowadays calling people hippies or conservitards is what passes for analysis, civic discourse, and problem solving.