[pictur]

Git is already as simple as possible with its own commands. I feel like we are making simple things more complicated with tools like this. If I start using this tool instead of git, I will probably start doing something hacky at some point. I don't want that. I don't want a history that keeps changing and getting weird with the use of rebase/squash. I don't think conflicts are a problem as long as a single history is kept up to date properly with git. The smoother the history, the easier it is to merge.

[Kuraj]

> I don't think conflicts are a problem as long as a single history is kept up to date properly with git.

That is easy when you work alone. It becomes more difficult as your team grows in size.

[lawn]

Weird take as Git is making things much more complex than they need to be, which is proven by Mercurial and Jujutsu that are much more intuitive while being as powerful.